MyPivots
KO
koolblue
Rep: 48,651
Posts: 16,032
KO
koolblue
Rep: 48,651
Posts: 16,032
NOTE: hourly projects to 837.50, i believe!(unless the low is taken out ,of course)
KO
koolblue
Rep: 48,651
Posts: 16,032
before you ask.. 2 notes! in the above examples i used 1.618 and added to the highs, when in realtime trading i use 2.618 and add to the beginning... its the same thing! Also and this is important, the only real projection is the first one(767.75), because the other 2 clearly show decent retracement at some point before the next peaks! My intention is to show that markets adhere to a rigid mathematical construction in their movements and are not 'random walk' as many others believe. That is the purpose of this post. PS: look at what the last 15 min candle is saying!(unless 802.25 is touched again, of course)
AK
ak1
Rep: 858
Posts: 740
If possible could you please upload this chart again with volume added below so that we can look at it with Bruce's perspective too. Thanks.
MO
Montecristo
Rep: 0
Posts: 15
I love the 15 minute but am married to the 60 minute. It shows 2-3 setups a day and that's all I need.
MY
myptofvu
Rep: 2,018
Posts: 666
Kool,

In the example above are you saying that you would still have been Bullish after the retrace from 768 because the 14:45 candle did not reach 739 and if it had your bias would now be towards the short side?
KO
koolblue
Rep: 48,651
Posts: 16,032
Mypto, yes!
KO
koolblue
Rep: 48,651
Posts: 16,032
But please understand,friend, im really neither bullish or bearish. I would expect higher prices forthcoming if the 739 low held a retest just as a matter of common sense basic technical analysis. Also since as we hit the expected 768 top a price projection was given that did not project lower than 739, but understand, im just a short term scalper! Nothing would prevent me from attempting short scalps on the way up after the 14:45 candle if my work said it was indicated. I dont want to leave you with the impression that i knew this would be 'the low' or even a long lasting one. I have opinions ,like anybody else on the 'longer' term picture ,but they are more based on standard tech. analysis ,generally, than my work.