first chart misdrawn.. but all here know that

Roofer .. this is a perfect example of what I was asking you about in the previous post. You used two pivots with simple line and you arrived at two different locations for a trade. How did you know that at 5th of February you can use the wick of the candle? (chart 3) And you used those on chart 5 to arrive at bottom on 6th of February but this time you used the low of the candle. I looked at your previous posts and could not find an explanation. To dumb to read between the lines :)

there are three charts in my previous presentations that deal exactly with that question and explain exactly the answer with words and charts because i had to answer that question for myself...it was one of the most important considerations and i explained my rejection rule...

Too bad Duane isn't around much anymore, he'd be able to tell everyone the exact page that was on. He was our resident information guy. He always knew where everything was on every page. It was amazing. :-)

done

i spent hundreds of hours checking this for myself. i spent hours creating the teaching charts so all could see. could some one explain to me how this was not findable by looking back through charts?as i said.. i held nothing back. every roadblock i found along the way i explained so traders would see.i no longer collect images of the setup. i do not need to.. all i collect are images of the very few times it fails. or only makes it to the minimum taget.. it is remarkable how there are two exact patterns that repeat... one will be obvious to all here.. a kane continuation pattern sets up against...

Thanks for reposting those three charts for everyone, roofer. I was mostly joking in two ways there. I didn't want to pass up a chance to tease Duane a little, because he truly is extraordinary in how he knows where everything is. I suspect he is either a savant of some kind, or he is keeping a detailed cross-reference database :-)

And secondly, I figured many might not do the work and root those out, so to preempt anyone asking you where they might be, I put that little joke in there. We all know that to be in here you must be willing to do the work, the slogan of the KT website and approach to developing one's methodology, and I wanted to be sure everyone knew that even if the information isn't right at hand and easy to access doesn't mean it isn't worth doing the work to dig up if roofer makes a reference to it. I'm not directing this at anyone in particular, of course, I just mean, heck, we have all this material in here all for free, spend the time to study, archive, organize, and pour over it all. Do the work, and do more. And once you are warmed up, get busy and really do some work. That's part of what it takes.