everything was in place... BUT WHERE'S THE FIB!!!???...A NUMBER I HAVE SEEN NOWHERE ELSE IN THE WRITTEN WORK OF FIB AUTHORS..... 1.902

You're welcome. Beautiful setup and trade, roofer.

Here's a fun one for you math geeks like me. I found a way to derive that 1.902 directly from the .685, and visa versa. So, knowing one produces the other. I wonder how many people know that, or can do the derivation. It can also be geometrically shown with retracement brackets and such. So, when I finally figured out a way to derive the .685 from Phi, and the 1.902 from Phi, it would only make sense, then, that one could be derived directly from the other, but I only recently worked that out. And some argue my work is not original...

BTW, that same trade on the ES was what I called my 'suicide trade' in my post in the ES section this AM. It sure was a nice one.

i want to be clear about something.i believe the geometry that is in the market always has been and will be...but i strongly believe jim kane's work is the definitive work on fibonacci and that any attempts to lessen his contribution are misdirected.

yes, we're all lucky to be here in the presence of Jim's fantastic work.