Definition of 'Trickle-Down Theory'
There are a few problems with the Trickle-Down Theory. First, there is no evidence to support the idea that the wealthy will actually invest their money back into the economy. In fact, studies have shown that the wealthy are more likely to save their money or invest it in overseas markets than they are to invest it in the United States.
Second, even if the wealthy do invest their money back into the economy, it is not clear that this will benefit the poor and middle class. The wealthy may invest in businesses that create jobs for other wealthy people, or they may invest in businesses that do not create many jobs at all.
Third, the Trickle-Down Theory ignores the fact that the wealthy already have a disproportionate amount of wealth in the United States. According to the latest data from the Federal Reserve, the top 1% of earners in the United States own more than 40% of the wealth, while the bottom 50% of earners own less than 1% of the wealth. This means that the wealthy are already doing very well, and giving them tax breaks will only make them wealthier.
For all of these reasons, the Trickle-Down Theory is not a sound economic theory. It is based on a flawed understanding of how the economy works, and it ignores the fact that the wealthy already have a disproportionate amount of wealth in the United States.
Do you have a trading or investing definition for our dictionary? Click the Create Definition link to add your own definition. You will earn 150 bonus reputation points for each definition that is accepted.
Is this definition wrong? Let us know by posting to the forum and we will correct it.