GLOBEX swinging wide.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
You made a great call on that short, M. I didn't like the odds for a new entry, but there was a seller lurking, the setup was a good one, and this one played out. I hope they get it fully into the primary area, so we can see what the next step is.
MR
mreiserer
Rep: 110
Posts: 2,220
Thanks. I was long too when it bounced and reversed my position at the short spot.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Keep one thing in mind. I'm not saying hold some of your position or anything, as I never give advice, but if the primary area doesn't hold (it likely will, I think), this may flush hard, so when I'm in this kind of position, I decide ahead of time if I'll give some of the position a good chunk of breathing room to see if the flush may play out.
MR
mreiserer
Rep: 110
Posts: 2,220
this will be interesting, I need to see something convincing for this to change directions
MR
mreiserer
Rep: 110
Posts: 2,220
I understand what you're saying, T.
I guess my comment was referring to traded timeframe and management.
If one were to trade this as a DT at a key line and 447 the traded timeframe should be a 120min chart.
Based on that it produced three minor bars that, imo, are inconclusive either way.
I didn't take the trade because just a trigger off the PTA wasn't good enough for me. For a daytrade I wanted to see a nice Wave 2 type pullback to get in (which it ultimately still might produce on the traded timeframe). It didn't give me that so I stood aside.
I guess my point is that I have often mismanaged trades in the past because I got caught up on lower timeframes where everything is magnified. while I find it important to see what goes on there and it has helped me understand price action better I have also found it misleading at times.
Like you said, you have the experience to tell the difference on a lower timeframe.
For me it's a work in progress.
I guess my comment was referring to traded timeframe and management.
If one were to trade this as a DT at a key line and 447 the traded timeframe should be a 120min chart.
Based on that it produced three minor bars that, imo, are inconclusive either way.
I didn't take the trade because just a trigger off the PTA wasn't good enough for me. For a daytrade I wanted to see a nice Wave 2 type pullback to get in (which it ultimately still might produce on the traded timeframe). It didn't give me that so I stood aside.
I guess my point is that I have often mismanaged trades in the past because I got caught up on lower timeframes where everything is magnified. while I find it important to see what goes on there and it has helped me understand price action better I have also found it misleading at times.
Like you said, you have the experience to tell the difference on a lower timeframe.
For me it's a work in progress.