MyPivots
Sign In
JA
jarek
Rep: 94
Posts: 3,474
The geometry in ES is also there:


Click image for original size


The question is: will it reverse right here to give the Wave 3 callers some more hope or will it accelerate to the upside to deprive them of it straight away?
RO
roofer
Rep: 3,689
Posts: 3,574
jarek- if you are refEring to myy GG post.... i meant the geometry is REALLY THERE...not one but3 predefined trade setups HITTING SIMULTANEOUSLY concurrent with X - MARKS THE SPOT....
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Well, I surely see it. But, without a chart, I fear many won't, and since no one has volunteered to take a shot at this, well, I'm not holding my breath we'll get a pictorial from anyone... Maybe roofer will grace us with his work, and maybe not, since if he wanted to post a chart he probably would have. So much for roofer doing a 'jim' and just posting the concept. Without jarek to actually post my ideas after I state them I'm afraid most wouldn't get them anyway, and without someone stepping up here, perhaps roofer's idea will be lost, too. Someone?
RO
roofer
Rep: 3,689
Posts: 3,574
another view
Click image for original size
AL
albert
Rep: 99
Posts: 3,094
Cool.

Al Kamego
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
They'd better come in soon or a swooooooooooosh may be coming...
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Swooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh.

I'm watching in here at 90.50, and below at 88-89, and then at 84-86.
JA
jarek
Rep: 94
Posts: 3,474
So they decided for at least a checkback from x marks the spot shown above. There is a line here from an upsloping set I showed last week. Acceleration or reversal?


Click image for original size
JA
jarek
Rep: 94
Posts: 3,474
Jim - would you also treat this as potential 3D?


Click image for original size
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Probably, jarek. It's a little choppy, which detracts from the 'climaxing' nature of the pattern.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Originally posted by jimkane

Swooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh.

I'm watching in here at 90.50, and below at 88-89, and then at 84-86.


So, 90.25 it was.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Plus 9.50 now. Not too bad.