Structure of the last advance indicates that the latter is more likely to be true.
Click image for original size
MA
MarcinO
Rep: 67
Posts: 5,506
ES still in a decision area. So far it is still unclear whether the move down to 1818 was the whole correction or W1 / AB leg of a bigger pattern.
Structure of the last advance indicates that the latter is more likely to be true.
Structure of the last advance indicates that the latter is more likely to be true.
RA
rat89
Rep: 0
Posts: 7,015
1.27 dbs setup....median line not quite hit though.....could still turn into a failed trade
posted spy yesterday....today iwm finally hit the 1.128
Click image for original size
posted spy yesterday....today iwm finally hit the 1.128
Click image for original size
Click image for original size
Click image for original size
Click image for original size
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
roofer is just going nuts posting in the KT public area. Some interesting stuff, too.
RA
rat89
Rep: 0
Posts: 7,015
it is so predictable that they will do that into the close on opex thursday....so classic
Originally posted by jimkane
Just exploding off this 1.000 ABCD to the tick.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Then they give back the entire pop, and more. So silly. A lot of this stuff, I feel, is awesome for trading, but it's just soooooooooooo stoo-pid.
RA
rat89
Rep: 0
Posts: 7,015
the market only exists for trading now....and to take as much out every pocket as possible
Originally posted by jimkane
Then they give back the entire pop, and more. So silly. A lot of this stuff, I feel, is awesome for trading, but it's just soooooooooooo stoo-pid.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
A fun post as I wrap it up for today. How many pages is that O'Bummercare? The one my hero Pelosi said "We have to pass it to see what's in it"? Can you imagine a representative actually saying that? Passing bills without even knowing what's in them, so you can know what's in them? Wouldn't you just read them (you know, do your job as a legislator and actually read and debate the bill) and then you'd know? Why do you have to pass it to know? Anyway, here's a sample paragraph, to give you an idea of what's in there...
1) Subparagraph (B) of section 6724(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to definitions), as amended by Section 1502, is amended by striking "or" at the end of clause (xxiii), by striking "and" at the end of clause (xxiv) and inserting "or" and by inserting after clause (xxiv) the following new clause: "(xxv) section 6056 (relating to returns relating to large employers required to report on health coverage)."
Good stuff, eh?
1) Subparagraph (B) of section 6724(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to definitions), as amended by Section 1502, is amended by striking "or" at the end of clause (xxiii), by striking "and" at the end of clause (xxiv) and inserting "or" and by inserting after clause (xxiv) the following new clause: "(xxv) section 6056 (relating to returns relating to large employers required to report on health coverage)."
Good stuff, eh?