1.1225 and 1.1125 were obvious tests of key lines.
My next level is around 1.1280.
Click image for original size
MA
MarcinO
Rep: 67
Posts: 5,506
It seems that all the discussions concerning Greece are meant only to send the Euro up... Nut we will see.
1.1225 and 1.1125 were obvious tests of key lines.
My next level is around 1.1280.
1.1225 and 1.1125 were obvious tests of key lines.
My next level is around 1.1280.
MA
MarcinO
Rep: 67
Posts: 5,506
That's why I couldn't find anything meaningful at this level.
My data (CME futures) starts in 2001.
My data (CME futures) starts in 2001.
MA
MarcinO
Rep: 67
Posts: 5,506
Euro overshot slightly my area, still well within a tolerance level, but wonder if they are going to reverse it just over bearish ABCD C point at 1.1001? I mean that breaking all possible TL's just to spare that low is a masterpiece plan. There was a guy here saying 'They are evil'.
The interesting fact is that the C point was also just below the PTA given by Jim's methodology, but again it was accurate enough to make me trade.
The interesting fact is that the C point was also just below the PTA given by Jim's methodology, but again it was accurate enough to make me trade.
MA
MarcinO
Rep: 67
Posts: 5,506
BTW, Jim will be excited to see you in the forum again.
Originally posted by mreiserer
well my chart goes back to 1995 which doesn't make too much sense I suppose. The set is from way back then. 95 high, 2000 low
MR
mreiserer
Rep: 110
Posts: 2,220
I hope this is within Jim's posting guidelines
Click image for original size
MA
MarcinO
Rep: 67
Posts: 5,506
Now we will see if that small double bottom will work.
If so, that would line up perfectly with my idea for looking at this zone,
If so, that would line up perfectly with my idea for looking at this zone,
Click image for original size
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
MRR! Very cool. If he stays we have a crew of three now.
Originally posted by MarcinO
BTW, Jim will be excited to see you in the forum again.
Originally posted by mreiserer
well my chart goes back to 1995 which doesn't make too much sense I suppose. The set is from way back then. 95 high, 2000 low
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
42.75 points low to high by my data. How's that for a trade? Three weekends in a row. Simply amazing. And pretty easy to see coming. No matter how many tens and tens of thousands of hours I do this I'll always be blown away by the order, the artistry of it all...
Originally posted by jimkane
They sure did. Easiest trading money I could ever imagine. And these are big moves, too.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
And here's a nice pictorial on 'the order and artistry of it all'.
Originally posted by rat89
tna then and now:
Click image for original size
Click image for original size
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
I'd probably prefer the one Fib not have a label on it, but I honestly can't recall if I've been watching that in here lately or not. Otherwise, it's just how I need them done. 'We' can recreate from your chart, but it doesn't blatantly show the key factors for those not in the club.
Originally posted by mreiserer
I hope this is within Jim's posting guidelines
Click image for original size
MR
mreiserer
Rep: 110
Posts: 2,220
We will see. I spent a lot of time training with Jim and I am surprised how much I have retained without having been active for a while. And I am always amazed how the methodology still holds up. If anything it's a matter of finding a comfort level. The last thing I want is adding more stress to my life :))