JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Okay, everyone, let's post. Don't make me implement the recent suggestion about a minimum number of posts to continue to have access...
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Sorry, no comments from me today, I fell asleep at my comp in all this HC^2 (HC squared) chop. I sure hope this isn't the world we are headed for... I'm spoiled with all this 30-40 point range stuff with multiple smooth swings up and down every day.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Notice that little TL over the declining price tops for today on say the 3-min.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
ES is right on that key 60-min smaller uptrending set lower //. I would expect that to bounce it. If it doesn't, it may flush it out a bit in a mini climax. Once that set goes, the price flow off the entire run up is altered. The possible beginning of the end and a key step in the formation of a top. We'll see how they handle it.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Yes, what I heard was incorrect, they said they beat, with less of a loss than expected (-59 vs. -56), but I think the announcer didn't realize that it's reversed for negative numbers, and -59 isn't better than -56 like +59 is better than +56. I tried to post that as soon as I heard it, I didn't get both the numbers, just the better than expected response at -59.

