JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Okay, everyone, let's post. Don't make me implement the recent suggestion about a minimum number of posts to continue to have access...
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Okay, it put in the higher low on the 1-min, at the key area. Now we see.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
1-min ABCD at line stopped it dead. It sure is weak. Even if it blows that little ABCD out, the fact that it had to sit there for so long sure is a weak sign.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Very cool. Rolls off the 1-min ABCD right to the 1.272 and starts to bounce. Nice finishing move, and another great chance for them to do the 60-min bounce. Again, let's see if they can do anything. Serious clue time, a few hours before earnings season kicks off. And keep this in mind. They sold into the open of earnings season, and AA is expected to report super-bad numbers. All I can see from this is relief. Even if they come in lower than expected, it will be a relief. Interesting layout...
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Went into an EXP and then down? Who knows. This thing moves more than the hips of a 1920's speakeasy dancer. I would just say more HC. Any trades require a very thick skin.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Yes, what I heard was incorrect, they said they beat, with less of a loss than expected (-59 vs. -56), but I think the announcer didn't realize that it's reversed for negative numbers, and -59 isn't better than -56 like +59 is better than +56. I tried to post that as soon as I heard it, I didn't get both the numbers, just the better than expected response at -59.
