JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
rat, sorry, I have no idea. It's not a term or concept I use in my methodology, so I don't know. If I had to guess, I think 'joey-D' and others use the term to mean you expect a reaction at a price-time area, and if it doesn't do it it means the exact opposite will happen. I have seen the term used a lot with the Bradley model, and it was used to imply the curve 'inverted' and the opposite of what was expected will happen, the curve is then 'flipped over' to see what the new prediction is. But I can't speak for 'joey-D', so I'm not sure how he uses the term.
Originally posted by rat89
jim, when you get a chance later, would you explain for me the concept of an inversion, and what the clues would be?
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
1405-09 is the next general area I am watching. But, as I said, it's nothing but 'up'.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Hmmm, Carl Futia raised his upside target from that 1442 to 1475 'and higher', and in the next few weeks. Wow. Time to buy a slew of calls, eh?
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Okay, the ES has pulled back enough in here with this tiny pullback, it can now rocket up to new highs for the move from here. Normally I'd be sweating this one tick from the high checkback, thinking it could really sell, but that's not the world we live in. The world we live in is one where the market only goes up...



