MyPivots
Sign In
MA
MarcinO
Rep: 67
Posts: 5,506
The Pound may need one more move up to 1.5170-80 before a larger move down.
Click image for original size
6b 2015 12 06 png


After that a further move up cannot be excluded to 1.5270 - 1.53.

Click image for original size
6b 2015 12 06 2 png
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Anyway, crude did take out that low for the move today. T. Boone Pickens said, I think it was last week or the week before, crude will not trade below $40 again. Hmmmm.

My area is 33-34, center of area. There is also the idea that it could grind down for awhile and the timing would be nice to see a 29 handle, just so they can 'test' that. I wouldn't expect more than 29.99 or 29.98 or some such number if this happens, although the entire area goes down to say 28.60. All I want is what I've wanted all this time, to see that lower 30's area that I've talked about for as long as I can remember. It's all I ask. It's just a few bucks away now...
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Understand, too, that 33.20 was the bubble sell-off low in early '09. No way they don't want to play with that, in my opinion. No way.
MA
MarcinO
Rep: 67
Posts: 5,506
Pound just above monster area around 1.4975.
Click image for original size
6b 2015 12 08 png
MA
MarcinO
Rep: 67
Posts: 5,506
Pound at 75. Now we will see.
MA
MarcinO
Rep: 67
Posts: 5,506
They broke and bactested this level, so further drop is likely.
RA
rat89
Rep: 0
Posts: 7,015
spy 15

price gapped and ran down to 205.78, where:
202.18 – 211.00 = .618 at 205.55
204.75 – 209.97 = .786 at 205.87

Note the sharp bounce now up to 208.04, where:
211.16 – 202.18 = .618 at 208.04
211.00 – 204.75 = .50 at 207.88
209.97 – 205.78 = .50 at 207.88
208.51 – 205.78 = .786 at 207.93 and .886 at 208.20

Click image for original size
screen shot 2015 12 08 at 11 27 15 am png
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Nice stuff, crew.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
I'm looking long side off this 'retest' area here.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Yeah, that LOD was just about right on the obvious TL for the ES, too.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089