Likely ES levels for the day
Piv- 1142.5, r1-1148.5, r2-1154.5, r3-1160.25. s1-1136.75, s2-1130.75, s3-1125.00
BR
BruceM
Rep: 216,211
Posts: 19,895
I would have to assume that folks don't like the fact that you aren't sharing the method even if the numbers seem no better or worse than any other formula. Perhaps this should go under journals as I'm not sure what the point of the thread is.
You aren't coming back on here with after the fact trades so that is cool. So what specifically is the point of the thread? I'm not trying to be a smart ass just trying to find the meaning.
You aren't coming back on here with after the fact trades so that is cool. So what specifically is the point of the thread? I'm not trying to be a smart ass just trying to find the meaning.
LU
luckytwelve
Rep: -120
Posts: 23
Actually Bruce, they have been tighter than the 'run of the mill' es pivot & r/s levels. A simple review of those by the reader will highlight said.
But they don't call 'tops' or 'bottoms', that is not their function.
One could have done worse than buying 1123.50 and waiting for a multiple time frame stochastic pinch over 1130.
There are many ways to skin a CAT.
But they don't call 'tops' or 'bottoms', that is not their function.
One could have done worse than buying 1123.50 and waiting for a multiple time frame stochastic pinch over 1130.
There are many ways to skin a CAT.
LU
luckytwelve
Rep: -120
Posts: 23
Too funny...voted down again for stating something in a very sensible manner.
LU
luckytwelve
Rep: -120
Posts: 23
That's strange Bruce...because the point of the thread is stated quite clearly. Just another way of looking at things, which folks can use or not use.
Just like everything else posted in the Forum.
Just like everything else posted in the Forum.
DA
day trading
Rep: 39,586
Posts: 6,369
luckytwelve - my guess is that you're getting voted down because what you are posting is not of any benefit to anybody. Just my 2c.
LU
luckytwelve
Rep: -120
Posts: 23
If someone plays with the levels provided, they may find them more useful than not.
I 'called the ball' at 1142.00 at 44 past the hour on the short term trading thread for this move. So, these levels, along with harmonics, help me. Perhaps they'll help others...who knows?
"A conclusion is simply the place where someone got tired of thinking."
I 'called the ball' at 1142.00 at 44 past the hour on the short term trading thread for this move. So, these levels, along with harmonics, help me. Perhaps they'll help others...who knows?
"A conclusion is simply the place where someone got tired of thinking."
BR
BruceM
Rep: 216,211
Posts: 19,895
I can't find this market call.......it's not posted....
I don't think any pro traders who come here are looking to become dependant on Someone elses numbers. None of us are immune from learning something from other folks though...so DT hit it perfectly...without any educational value then it is just useless to the reader......
I don't think any pro traders who come here are looking to become dependant on Someone elses numbers. None of us are immune from learning something from other folks though...so DT hit it perfectly...without any educational value then it is just useless to the reader......
Originally posted by luckytwelve
If someone plays with the levels provided, they may find them more useful than not.
I 'called the ball' at 1142.00 at 44 past the hour on the short term trading thread for this move. So, these levels, along with harmonics, help me. Perhaps they'll help others...who knows?
"A conclusion is simply the place where someone got tired of thinking."