Broader indexes like IWM shown by Roofer and MID below should show us the way in the coming days:



They were usually first to advance in the recent months and we'll see soon if this is the case this time as well

when i go to home page, it stops at 12, if i post it goes to 17/// eric made a good point.... one i wondered about earlier.....all these 1's and 2's are very bullish....price has risen quickly on no volume... despite the news, despite what they say, there are no sellers left....i am looking for upside explosion next week.based on all those 1's,2's leading to a big 3

.887 of larger swing at 159.94
.887 of last swing at 160.08

if it's going to break out and run, what would be the next pullback target?

I've noticed that too about the page numbers. They don't seem to refresh. The browser doesn't "catch" that there is a change and so the browser uses the page from the cache instead of doing a reload. And the cached page doesn't have the current page numbers. It's one of those minor bugs to be aware of.

Originally posted by roofer

when i go to home page, it stops at 12, if i post it goes to 17///

here's another goodie

XOM 5 minute.
Respecting the schiff magenta set at the morning reversals.

Hi, Ixon, I don't trade the eur/usd so can't comment on its price action behavior. What I see structure wise in the D1 area:
If it reverses, it would be a false breakout of the bear TL.
Some people might call it a H&S pattern if reverses at D1.
It could be a 3 pushes up in a channel.

I'd put another set on and see if you get an x marks the spot - a schiff and/or downsloping set.

Originally posted by ixon

HI Guys

I see this setup on weekly eur/usd. Whot You think of that?

Click image for original size

Nice charts, all. Nice update by jarek before he left, too. The action in crude, gold, 10-year, Euro, beans (still an ongoing play off the big ABCD), etc., it's just awesome. I could care less that the ES is slow today.

Thanks for posting the CF chart. I finally understand what the saying means.

Originally posted by rat89

Click image for original size

Yeah, that 1338 rings a bell, but I confirmed the high by various sources and feel it is correct. I even checked several other contracts, but couldn't find that 1338. I've seen it before, though...