MyPivots
Sign In
    JA
    jarek
    Rep: 94
    Posts: 3,474
    4
    Broader indexes like IWM shown by Roofer and MID below should show us the way in the coming days:

    Click image for original size


    They were usually first to advance in the recent months and we'll see soon if this is the case this time as well
    RO
    roofer
    Rep: 3,689
    Posts: 3,574
    1
    was looking for 3 of 3 of 3... but , vol,ad/dec and the tanking of semi's did not support..AAPL.... STIILL looks fishy....
    RO
    roofer
    Rep: 3,689
    Posts: 3,574
    2
    Click image for original size
    JI
    jimkane
    Rep: 3,058
    Posts: 33,089
    0
    (Edited )
    Yeah, I agree with that.

    Originally posted by roofer

    was looking for 3 of 3 of 3... but , vol,ad/dec and the tanking of semi's did not support..AAPL.... STIILL looks fishy....
    ER
    EricD
    Rep: 63
    Posts: 692
    2
    Click image for original size
    ER
    EricD
    Rep: 63
    Posts: 692
    4
    update...ES AT A DECISION ..
    Click image for original size
    ER
    EricD
    Rep: 63
    Posts: 692
    1
    Originally posted by EricD

    so inside day in ES with globex testing yesterdays low....should be directional or outside....

    so will it setup for Jim's Sunday globex /Monday dance and just chop in here or will late buyers at the top get washed and rinsed.
    RO
    roofer
    Rep: 3,689
    Posts: 3,574
    5
    let the geometry decide...if they can get it outside this set....then i lose
    Click image for original size
    RA
    rat89
    Rep: 0
    Posts: 7,015
    2
    Click image for original size
    RA
    rat89
    Rep: 0
    Posts: 7,015
    2
    and I'm just wondering what a potential .886 retest will look like timewise and indicator wise....
    Click image for original size
    JI
    jimkane
    Rep: 3,058
    Posts: 33,089
    1
    Finally. 133.15 next?
    JI
    jimkane
    Rep: 3,058
    Posts: 33,089
    0
    Yeah, that 1338 rings a bell, but I confirmed the high by various sources and feel it is correct. I even checked several other contracts, but couldn't find that 1338. I've seen it before, though...