MyPivots
Sign In
JA
jarek
Rep: 94
Posts: 3,474
Broader indexes like IWM shown by Roofer and MID below should show us the way in the coming days:

Click image for original size


They were usually first to advance in the recent months and we'll see soon if this is the case this time as well
TX
tx_ches
Rep: -10
Posts: 514
IWM behaving well so far. No games in GZ.
JA
jarek
Rep: 94
Posts: 3,474
Originally posted by tx_ches

Jarek, what do the 1 and 2 labels mean?


They mean Waves 1 and 2 of the move off Kane ABCD. These are Kane Waves and not Elliott Waves
JA
jarek
Rep: 94
Posts: 3,474
Originally posted by jarek

...A break to the upside here would be quite bullish

I meant real breakout and not the one so far, which could have been just a finishing move forming 3D at a spike line:

Click image for original size
TX
tx_ches
Rep: -10
Posts: 514
CLF 5 minute chart.
A little dip on the open is what was needed to fuel the opening drive.
TX
tx_ches
Rep: -10
Posts: 514
Chart

Originally posted by tx_ches

CLF 5 minute chart.
A little dip on the open is what was needed to fuel the opening drive.

Click image for original size
TX
tx_ches
Rep: -10
Posts: 514
Thanks. I was trying to read them as Elliott waves and it wasn't making sense.

Originally posted by jarek

Originally posted by tx_ches

Jarek, what do the 1 and 2 labels mean?


They mean Waves 1 and 2 of the move off Kane ABCD. These are Kane Waves and not Elliott Waves

AL
albert
Rep: 99
Posts: 3,094
Kame 4PCP ABCD going onto today's open.

Al Kamego
Click image for original size
TX
tx_ches
Rep: -10
Posts: 514
Extending that downsloping A to C red trend line out could be interesting intersection.

Originally posted by albert

Kame 4PCP ABCD going onto today's open.

AL
albert
Rep: 99
Posts: 3,094
tx_ches,

Yes indeed. Thank you for pointing that out.

Good Trading,

Al Kamego
Click image for original size
RA
rat89
Rep: 0
Posts: 7,015
bullish abcd at key area, double .886 at line.....does it get back to the upper line?

Click image for original size

Click image for original size
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Yeah, that 1338 rings a bell, but I confirmed the high by various sources and feel it is correct. I even checked several other contracts, but couldn't find that 1338. I've seen it before, though...