There is not much to add to the extensive coverage of the recent weeks here. While looking for geometry of Friday's turn on the continuous contract basis I came up with the following picture:
We have an almost ideal .382 bullish ABCD here. Thanks to Roofer's findings based on thousands of examples we know that probability of taking out the high equals in such case 87%. What's more in order to hit Jim's target zone at the line, a pretty fast move would be required... We'll see next week if we are on the right track and ... in the right train
JA
jarek
Rep: 94
Posts: 3,474
Originally posted by roofer
over the months of jan and feb across hundreds of stocks the geometry of a crash built like the snow pack of a potential avalanche...hundreds of stocks with mimimum targets AND crash targets..
Great, great respect again Geo! From what you write it is not the first time the geometry foretells real life dramatic events. It is the first time however I see it developing "live". And I'm in awe thinking about the power of geometry...
ER
EricD
Rep: 63
Posts: 692
agree Jarek...watching this 1269ish area first for a reaction...wouldnt be surprised for a retest of the lows ...
JA
jarek
Rep: 94
Posts: 3,474
... but on the other hand I wonder if this test and multiple retests of the upper ML last week do not foretell the drop to the lower ML at 1230-1240 area, where also the most distant geometries of the other issues could certainly be met:
I guess it's better to stay out when one has such doubts...
I guess it's better to stay out when one has such doubts...
JA
jarek
Rep: 94
Posts: 3,474
Originally posted by jarek
This bearish KZ TD ABCD at important line in Crude simply has to play out if the downsloping major ML is about to be reached in this move down...
And yet it didn't... It morphed into an EXP ABCD for a second backtest of this lower ML of the Schiff set:
If this one doesn't play out either, then the major downsloping ML could not be reached at all in this move down and new highs would be looming over horizon. In this environment??








