JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
I can't get a hold of the forum owner, Guy. I tried a few times, and no reply. He usually responds back so quickly I think he must be like me, tied to his computer. It's very odd to not hear back from him. I hope everything is all right with him.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Do the early April ABCD set and the price flows/SL's from say 4/20-25 (use SL lines and a ML from an appropriate adjusted set, I don't want to say too much in here...). There's more, but what a framework.
Originally posted by MarcinO
I'm working on 62-64 and can see what game is behind that level, but most of the things I draw indicate 73-75 level.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
We knew you were going to nut that AAPL, rat, that was never in doubt. The indices are jammed up in there, as you show. It's the TNX I am most interested in, for the refi possibilities for everyone. To do the one more leg down on that I want would require a pretty hefty sell in the indices. I still keep hoping for the quicky 'bear' market, the final low in rates, then Armstrong's doubling from there. I'd really hate it if the world imploded i.e. the sovereign defaults start, rates pop, the market doubles, and no last chance refi's could take place...
MA
MarcinO
Rep: 67
Posts: 5,506
Thanks, Jim. My point was not that I cannot find stuff coming together there, but most of the sets I tried at first clearly indicated low 70's, so it's an alternative level.
Originally posted by jimkane
Do the early April ABCD set and the price flows/SL's from say 4/20-25 (use SL lines and a ML from an appropriate adjusted set, I don't want to say too much in here...). There's more, but what a framework.
Originally posted by MarcinO
I'm working on 62-64 and can see what game is behind that level, but most of the things I draw indicate 73-75 level.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Crude, which has just been on a tear lately, really got monkey-hammered on that inventory report. I wonder how long until it makes it all back?
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Okay, the ES is now doing that thing where it is clearing itself out. So, the long looks pretty good now.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Oh, I see. Yes, I agree. I just thought, flow-wise, and ABCD-wise, this really stands out when I look at a blank chart and let my eye go to one spot.
Originally posted by MarcinO
Thanks, Jim. My point was not that I cannot find stuff coming together there, but most of the sets I tried at first clearly indicated low 70's, so it's an alternative level.
Originally posted by jimkane
Do the early April ABCD set and the price flows/SL's from say 4/20-25 (use SL lines and a ML from an appropriate adjusted set, I don't want to say too much in here...). There's more, but what a framework.
Originally posted by MarcinO
I'm working on 62-64 and can see what game is behind that level, but most of the things I draw indicate 73-75 level.
JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
And here's the new topic. Everyone please go there and vote that up (if you think it is good). Also, I added a post to the above one thread, so make sure even if you voted before you go and vote up that one. I know there are more people reading this than four, so please, everyone, help me out. I need to make sure that they don't seem vulnerable to down voting and we get the positive vibes going. Thanks.
http://www.mypivots.com/board/topic/8616/-1/charts-from-4-29-16
http://www.mypivots.com/board/topic/8616/-1/charts-from-4-29-16





