MyPivots
Sign In
JA
jarek
Rep: 94
Posts: 3,474
I'm wondering about possible scenarios for a full playout of this test and retest at SPX showed here on Friday:

Click image for original size


... and the only reason for a quick drop from here to the lower ML could in my opinion be a failed 5th wave at SPX and ES. Because on many other indexes the recent rise looks like already completed 5th wave:

Click image for original size
TX
tx_ches
Rep: -10
Posts: 514
You didn't draw the TLs in but it looks to my eyeball like a down TL and up TL both came into that area.

Originally posted by rat89

abcd to .382 and .886 on gap on 5

Click image for original size

JI
jimkane
Rep: 3,058
Posts: 33,089
Keep on breakin' down, baby. Got to love it. Here's to hoping this is at the least a 'W3' of 'W5'.
JA
jarek
Rep: 94
Posts: 3,474
If yesterday's bearish KZ ABCD was W4, then we already are in the target zone for this move:

Click image for original size
JA
jarek
Rep: 94
Posts: 3,474
Here is my expanding triangle chart from few days ago:

Click image for original size


One have to admit that it doesn't look good for bulls with this potential return move after the breakdown
JA
jarek
Rep: 94
Posts: 3,474
And here is the set of last hope for bulls for containing the decline above the Kane Zone:

Click image for original size


There is no pattern though (or at least I don't see it)
JA
jarek
Rep: 94
Posts: 3,474
This triple top after reaching exactly the rising ML may be the first sign of troubles for bulls in EUR:

Click image for original size


Will watch the reaction to this 1.272 DT ABCD at lines
IX
ixon
Rep: 0
Posts: 25
It's looks like 0XABC is in the game on EUR/USD. I wait for D.


Click image for original size
AL
albert
Rep: 99
Posts: 3,094
jarek,

Your ES charts are "clear as a bell." Thanks for posting.

Good Trading,

Al Kamego
RA
rat89
Rep: 0
Posts: 7,015
Click image for original size
RA
rat89
Rep: 0
Posts: 7,015
watching 5342
Click image for original size
JA
jarek
Rep: 94
Posts: 3,474
Originally posted by jimkane

... so the Gross post will be short...


I see that we have a new definition of "short"