MyPivots
Sign In
JA
jarek
Rep: 94
Posts: 3,474
I'm wondering about possible scenarios for a full playout of this test and retest at SPX showed here on Friday:

Click image for original size


... and the only reason for a quick drop from here to the lower ML could in my opinion be a failed 5th wave at SPX and ES. Because on many other indexes the recent rise looks like already completed 5th wave:

Click image for original size
JA
jarek
Rep: 94
Posts: 3,474
ES doesn't necessarily look as in failed 5th wave scenario... Will watch the reaction to our bullish ABCD then:

Click image for original size
JA
jarek
Rep: 94
Posts: 3,474
Crude chose to respect our geometry:

Click image for original size


But it's still far, far away from the point where bulls should bother at all
JA
jarek
Rep: 94
Posts: 3,474
The previous small bullish ABCD resulted in couple of points reaction, but it wasn't W2 of the move of our big bullish DT. Maybe this one:

Click image for original size
RA
rat89
Rep: 0
Posts: 7,015
good morning all.....here's one I missed friday


1.27 at the median line of set anchored at the gap....

Click image for original size
RA
rat89
Rep: 0
Posts: 7,015
funny how it bounced right off that line


Click image for original size
RA
rat89
Rep: 0
Posts: 7,015
more light humor


Click image for original size
RA
rat89
Rep: 0
Posts: 7,015
Click image for original size
TX
tx_ches
Rep: -10
Posts: 514
If you dup the green set and place it below, you have an intersection with the green and downsloping set at the exact time.

Originally posted by rat89

funny how it bounced right off that line


Click image for original size


Click image for original size
RA
rat89
Rep: 0
Posts: 7,015
great eye tx!

Originally posted by tx_ches

If you dup the green set and place it below, you have an intersection with the green and downsloping set at the exact time.



Click image for original size
RA
rat89
Rep: 0
Posts: 7,015
will they jump the retest of the lower line?

Click image for original size
JA
jarek
Rep: 94
Posts: 3,474
Originally posted by jimkane

... so the Gross post will be short...


I see that we have a new definition of "short"