Nice chart, Duane. Post the all-sessions with a tick chart and look at that.
OK, here's my artwork. Step aside Van Gogh, Picasso, all you guys, and look at some
real art. It's not art because
I drew it, it's art because it exists.
Here's how I adjusted my 13-min set once I could see the lower // of the older set was going to go. If you use the 'old' set you'll see the division and warning lines point to similar things. The two arrows show the area I will zoom in on, so keep in mind this lower //, which I won't show on the 1-min here, to avoid getting it too cluttered.
The first arrow is where I locked this obvious 1-min set. Do the work and you should be able to find this one easy. That's also the lower // area from the 13-min set. The second arrow shows the first rollover point, right off a .564, right down to the ML, which was another .564, at the third arrow. It ramps straight up to the fourth arrow, at the upper //, at the .300 off the high of the day. Just look at these time factors! It drops like a rock, right back to the ML, which is at an .886 and 1.460 overlap, at the fifth arrow, where that 13-min lower // comes back in again. Keep in mind I am only showing a framework here, at best.
Up it goes (check that pullback and see what that shows), up to the first outer upper division line, right in the .786-.886 zone. What does that mean? Yes, the green numbers show the bigger 4-Point Continuation Pattern that came together right there by the sixth arrow. Down it goes to a new LOD, right at the ML again (where's the 1.272?) by the seventh arrow, where it bounces up to a .447, at the upper // by the eighth arrow, where it rolls. It then bounces and hits the upper // again, where it fades off, at the last arrow.
Now, here are my questions:
1) Is this all random?
2) Do I perceive this to give me any kind of edge?
3) Without even hinting at making any claims whatsoever, is it any mystery why some people have told me they have never seen anyone on the right side of the market as much as me?
4) Now, is that art, or what?
5) Isn't it cool to have a forum where everyone has already bought the books, and hence with nothing to sell, 'prove', or try to convince anyone of, I/we can show a chart like this after the fact and it is understood and accepted that it isn't a well-chosen after the fact example designed to show an unusual situation, and convince people to buy the material?
The methodology is what it is, the market is what it is. It either helps you, or it doesn't. If it does, incorporate it, if it doesn't, don't. I know what my viewpoint is.
P.S. The questions are rhetorical, and not meant to actually be answered :-)
Charts courtesy of Dynamic Traders Group -
www.DynamicTraders.com
